Product Liability - Written by Beasley Allen on Thursday, May 1, 2008 15:43 - 0 Comments
Roof strength rule delayed again
Safety regulators at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) are having a difficult time updating the controversial standard for vehicle roof strength. The present standard has been on the books since 1971 and a proposed new standard has been repeatedly delayed. Now, NHTSA has asked for additional information from automakers, safety advocates, and the public about the proposed new standards. The most recent version of the rule under consideration at NHTSA would require both sides of a vehicle roof to support at least two and a half times the vehicle’s weight. But safety advocates aren’t buying it. Public Citizen President Joan Claybrook, who headed NHTSA from 1977 through 1981, observed:
The proposal is still a static test - one based on mathematical calculations, rather than a dynamic physical test - and it still is at 2.5 times the weight of the vehicle.
The agency has played games with the regulation since the first NHTSA revision of the roof strength rule came about. Everybody knows the current rule is very weak. The existing standard mandates that just one side support at least one and a half of the weight of a vehicle weight. The initial revision of the roof strength rule from NHTSA required support of two and a half times vehicle weight but would have continued testing on one side only. NHTSA Administrator Nicole Nason now says that double-sided testing is a viable alternative approach.
Safety activists have demanded a “dynamic” rollover test, which would require rolling a moving vehicle to gather data. Automakers insist that such a test will be costly, and that accidents involving rollovers include too many variables to design a reliable test. Each year, nearly 10,000 people die in rollover crashes, but government data suggest that only a small percentage of vehicle occupants are killed by collapsing roofs. Public Citizen President Joan Claybrook had this to say about the proposed rule:
The proposal absolutely ignores ejection and containment in the vehicle during rollovers, in which 10,500 people die each year and another 17,000 are seriously injured. To justify a strong rollover protection standard, the agency should address roof crush, ejection and containment as one standard.
Congress most recently directed NHTSA to adopt a new roof standard by April 2009. NHTSA plans to issue a new rollover rule later this year. I hope the agency will put the safety and welfare of people first and foremost and get the job done.
- Other races of interest for the general election
- The other congressional races
- Candidate for the Alabama Supreme Court calls for appointed judiciary
- Citigroup may have to pay billions in buybacks
- The outlook for passage of a strong DUI bill appears to be better
- Lilly Zyprexa group buyers win class action status
- Contessa premium foods wins Trade Secrets Case
- Judge awards $1.2 billion judgment to Johnson & Johnson
- Citigroup sues Wachovia and Wells fargo for $60 billion
- False claims Act Case pending against McKesson and Golden Horizons
- Florida sues MercK to recover money spent on Vioxx
- Johnson & Johnson paid $68 million to settle birth control cases
- Class action lawsuit says Biovail misled investors
- Missouri Court upholds $8.5 million Polio Vaccine Award
- Georgia Supreme Court rules that couple can sue vaccine company
- Experts conclude Pfizer manipulated studies
- New study shows drug samples may adversley affect children
- Excellent post.Preserve the smashing work,You should definitely have to keep upd...
- First-Class post.Maintain the eminent work,You should definitely have to keep up...
- As many people know, those who undergo MRI procedures often take gadolinium, a r...
- As many people know, those who undergo MRI procedures often take gadolinium, a r...
- Thanks for the notice! It's now corrected....
- It's Hand Arendall LLC, there's no comma between Hand and Arendall...
- I understand that the first $9000 is being currently released and depending on t...
- When you say they are doing this as quickly as possible, what do you mean.? As...
- Beasley Allen Law Firm
- Southern Injury Lawyer
- Yamaha Rhino Lawyer
- Nursing Home Abuse
- Mesothelioma Lawyer
- Mesothelioma Support Blog
- FLSA
- Unum Provident Denied Disability
- Morgan Keegan Investment Fraud
- Jere Beasley Report
- Trasylol Recall
- Avandia and Heart Attacks
- Gadolinium and NSF
- Medtronic Heart Lead Recall
- Vytorin Cancer
- Steven Johnson Syndrome (SJS)
- Pain Pumps
- Chantix Recall
- HRT and Breast Cancer
- Ortho Evra and Blood Clots
- Heparin Recall
- Fosamax and ONJ
- Kugel Hernia Patch Recall
- Digitek Recall
Recent Settlements - Aug 7, 2008 14:15 - 0 Comments
North Carolina Settles Jail Fire Death Claims
More In Recent Settlements
- Settlement Of Wrongful Death Case
- GM Rollover Case Settled In Houston County
- SCOTUS Rejects Continental Carbon’s Appeal
- Roof Crush Settlement with Ford Motor Co.
Product Liability - Nov 10, 2008 10:08 - 0 Comments
Yamaha Rhino demonstrated for CPSC
More In Product Liability
- FEMA not immune from toxic trailer suits
- The overlooked hazard relating to cargo injuries
- Single vehicle accidents remain a problem
- New federal rule attempts to preemt state tort claims related to seat belt injuries
- U-haul trailers and more of the same
Recalls Update - Oct 16, 2008 8:28 - 0 Comments
190,000 Soccer goals recalled
More In Recalls Update
- Rapid Reel recalls portable garden hose carts
- Sony recalls 440,000 Vaio laptops
- Worldwise, Inc. recalls retractable dog leashes
- Warning relating to Bassinets after 2 babies are strangled
- Coffee makers recalled by Sears due to fire and burn hazards
Leave a Reply