Mass Torts, Medtronic Recall, Recalls Update - Written by Scott Thomas on Wednesday, October 24, 2007 7:10 - 0 Comments
Medtronic Sprint Fidelis Defibrillator Lead Recalled After 5 People Die
Defective lead recall
On October 15, 2007, Medtronic suspended sale of their Sprint Fidelis Defibrillator leads (Models 6930, 6931, 6948, 6949) after receiving reports of 5 fatalities. I am glad to report that Metronic finally took the appropriate action by suspending global sales of the defective leads and recalling the leads already on the market. Unfortunately, however, this defective lead recall came too late for five innocent people that trusted Medtronic with their lives.
Faulty design
The Medtronic recall is for defective defibrillator leads which are designed to carry a live-saving signal from an implanted device to the heart, in the event that a dangerous heart rhythm is detected.
The problem here is that if the lead wires from the defibrillator to the heart are broken or fractured, the defibrillator may erroneously detect an abnormal heart rhythm, causing it to send an unnecessary, painful jolt of electricity to the heart. Or even worse, if a life-saving shock is needed, it may never reach the heart.
Evidently, that is exactly what happened to at least five patients who are reported to have died as the result of a defective lead wire.
The dilemma for patients
According to Medtronic, over 268,000 patients in the United States have been implanted with the defective lead (as part of the defibrillator) since 2004. And of those 280,000, as many as 5,000 - 10,000 patients could see their leads fail within 30 months of being implanted.
Medtronic has offered to pay for the replacement of fractured leads and to contribute $800 towards the replacement surgery, however, they will not compensate patients who wish to replace a “working” lead. So, the great dilemma facing patients and doctors is whether or not to roll the dice with a lead that currently works, but could fail at any time.
The other option would be to shell out thousands of dollars in out-of-pocket expense to replace the recalled lead. This option has the potential to damage the fragile blood vessel that the lead runs through.
A third option would be to leave the defective lead in place and run a new lead along side it.
Each of these options has inherent risks which need to be considered when discussing a course of action with one’s doctor.
The legal option
Beasley Allen law firm is currently reviewing cases against Medtronic, the manufacturers of the Sprint Fidelis defibrillator.
If you or a loved one have been injured by a defective heart lead, you may have a claim against the manufacturer of the Sprint Fidelis defibrillator.
You may contact Beasley Allen Law firm for a free legal consultation by filling out a brief questionnaire, or by calling their toll free number (1-800-898-2034).
- Update on 15-Passenger Vans
- Lilly Zyprexa group buyers win class action status
- Report faults FAA over maintenance outsourcing
- Jere Beasley Report, December 2008
- Class Action Settlement Involving Unearned Premiums For Credit Insurance
- Roof Crush Case Settled
- Settlement Of A Playground Injury Case
- Settlement In Motor Vehicle Case
- Roof Collapse Settlement
- Settlement Of A Construction Site Case
- Lawsuit Involving 18 Wheeler Crash Settled
- Huntsville Bus Crash Cases Settled
- Electrocution Case Settled In Alabama
- The Time Has Come For Constitutional Reform In Alabama
- Montgomery Police Department Will File Suit To Recover Damages For Faulty Surveillance Equipment
- help pastor...
- I am trying to find the article in Special Recognitions XXV " My Father , Geor...
- Where's the names of criminals like Ben Bernanke and Hank Paulson? They have pe...
- help and pray for israel baptist church pastor...
- Please review my web site and use it in any way to promote the safe use or no us...
- Friday, December 5, 2008
Some Americans once trusted failed FAA Acting Administ...
- My 10 year old granddaughter, Alexis James, was killed in a 15-passenger van sin...
- The backache that doc in a box said was a kidney infection is eventually diagnos...
- Beasley Allen Law Firm
- Coal Ash Spill
- Mesothelioma Support Blog
- Southern Injury Lawyer
- Nursing Home Abuse
- Mesothelioma Lawyer
- Yamaha Rhino Lawyer
- FLSA
- Jere Beasley Report
- Unum Provident Denied Disability
- Morgan Keegan Investment Fraud
- Kugel Hernia Patch Recall
- Trasylol Recall
- Vytorin Cancer
- Medtronic Heart Lead Recall
- Digitek Recall
- Gadolinium and NSF
- Heparin Recall
- Steven Johnson Syndrome (SJS)
- HRT and Breast Cancer
- Chantix Recall
- Avandia and Heart Attacks
- Pain Pumps
- Ortho Evra and Blood Clots
- Fosamax and ONJ
Recent Settlements - Jan 6, 2009 7:53 - 0 Comments
Class Action Settlement Involving Unearned Premiums For Credit Insurance
More In Recent Settlements
- Roof Crush Case Settled
- Settlement Of A Playground Injury Case
- Settlement In Motor Vehicle Case
- Roof Collapse Settlement
- Settlement Of A Construction Site Case
Product Liability - Dec 4, 2008 14:06 - 0 Comments
Heavy Truck post-collision fires
More In Product Liability
- Update on 15-Passenger Vans
- Government probes off-road vehicles after numerous accidents
- Yamaha Rhino demonstrated for CPSC
- FEMA not immune from toxic trailer suits
- The overlooked hazard relating to cargo injuries
Recalls Update - Dec 30, 2008 15:38 - 0 Comments
Alabama Firm Recalls Hot Dog Products For Possible Listeria Contamination
More In Recalls Update
- Maine Firm Recalls Frozen Stuffed Chicken Products
- Covidien Recalls Syringes Posing Risk To Diabetics
- Claire’s Recalls Children’s Metal Necklaces
- Sherwin-Williams Co. Recalls Krylon UV Fabric Protector
- Cybex International Recalls Treadmills Due To Fall Hazard
Leave a Reply