Premises Liability - Written by Beasley Allen on Wednesday, August 22, 2007 5:44 - 0 Comments
North Carolina Supreme Court Allows Jail Fire Lawsuits to go Forward
Our firm represents two families who lost loved ones in a jail fire in Mitchell County, North Carolina on May 3, 2002. The fire started in a storage room that had been added on to the older jail facility many years before the fire. North Carolina statutes required the North Carolina Department for Health and Human Services to conduct bi-annual inspections of the jail facility, including this addition, to insure that all parts of the jail met all applicable fire and building codes. Nonetheless, the addition to the original jail facility did not meet North Carolina State building or fire codes. As a result of the fire on May 3, 2002, eight men being held in the facility died from smoke inhalation when the jailer was unable to unlock the second floor jail cell to allow the prisoners to get out of the fire.
Following this fire, the North Carolina Department of Labor conducted an investigation into the fire. The Department of Labor determined that the Department of Health and Human Services had breached its duty to properly inspect the Mitchell County Jail facility to insure that it met all applicable codes. The Department of Labor also determined that the inspectors who conducted jail facility inspections had not been properly trained to determine all code violations.
We filed suit on behalf of our clients against the State of North Carolina for failure to perform its statutory duties to inspect the Mitchell County Jail. In North Carolina, a suit of this nature is brought before an administrative board within the Department of Industrial Relations. Immediately after suit was filed, the State of North Carolina sought to dismiss our clients’ claims, asserting immunity under the public duty doctrine. The trial court denied the State’s request. North Carolina immediately filed an appeal with the full Industrial Commission in an effort to reverse the trial court’s decision. The full commission found in favor of the plaintiffs and denied the State’s motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ claims. The State of North Carolina then filed a further appeal to the North Carolina Court of Appeals. The North Carolina Court of Appeals found that the plaintiffs’ claims could proceed against the State in this case. Not to be deterred, the State of North Carolina filed a final appeal to the State Supreme Court. On June 28, 2007, the Supreme Court rejected the State’s claim that it was immune from suit in this type of action and found that the plaintiffs could go forward with their actions.
These cases have been a long and difficult process for our clients and have been appealed by the State of North Carolina for nearly five years while the families have been unable to find out what happened to their family members on the night of the fire. We attempted to take sworn testimony from eyewitnesses while these appeals were pending, but the State blocked every effort we made to find out what happened the night of this fire. Now that the Supreme Court of North Carolina has held that the families’ claims can go forward, we finally will be able to help the families learn about the details of the fire and why their loved ones perished that night. Ben Baker is the lead lawyer on the case for our firm and has worked extremely hard to keep the cases on track.
- More Concerns Over Blood Thinner From China
- Air Compressors At Advance Auto Parts Recalled
- Crackdown On Payday Lenders In Ohio
- Albert Preston Brewer
- OSHA Uncovers A Number Of Refinery Violations
- Xerox Settles Securities Lawsuit For $670 Million
- Candidate for the Alabama Supreme Court calls for appointed judiciary
- Goodyear Tire Case Settled
- Connecticut Sues Eli Lilly Over Zyprexa Marketing
- Artificial Turf Can Pose A Health Hazard
- Citigroup may have to pay billions in buybacks
- More on the Staten Island Ferry crash
- Motor vehile accidents affect youg lives
- Pennsylvania jury awards $2.2 million to estate of DUI crash victim
- Almost half of Alabama highway deaths involve drinking
- A report on drunken-driving deaths nationally for 2007
- More airlines fail to comply with safety ratings
- Litigation involving aircraft crashes
- Fastenal Co. settles class action lawsuit
- Former shipyard worker wins his mesothelioma trual
- OSHA sites contractors in deadly New York crane collapse
- The BP plant explosion state lawsuits are over
- can you please give me more information on this subject. West telemarketing. tha...
- Lilly's top blockbuster Zyprexa is implicated in 'causing' diabetes and Lilly's...
- I cannot recall when eligile individuals will begin to receive compensation. Ple...
- Take a look at what VP candidate Palin did as Mayor of Wasilla concerning drinki...
- Cuomo is in no position to investigate others as he secretly harasses my girlfri...
- My questions is why would anyone intentionally design a vehicle to be top heavy?...
- I disagree with Judge Paseur on this issue. I think that taking the original de...
- If all members of NOW would contribute 25 dollars to Segall, he would be able to...
- Beasley Allen Law Firm
- Yamaha Rhino Lawyer
- Mesothelioma Support Blog
- Southern Injury Lawyer
- Nursing Home Abuse
- Mesothelioma Lawyer
- Unum Provident Denied Disability
- Morgan Keegan Investment Fraud
- Gadolinium and NSF
- Kugel Hernia Patch Recall
- Avandia and Heart Attacks
- Heparin Recall
- Vytorin Cancer
- Fosamax and ONJ
- Digitek Recall
- HRT and Breast Cancer
- Pain Pumps
- Steven Johnson Syndrome (SJS)
- Medtronic Heart Lead Recall
- Chantix Recall
- Ortho Evra and Blood Clots
- Trasylol Recall
Recent Settlements - Aug 7, 2008 14:15 - 0 Comments
North Carolina Settles Jail Fire Death Claims
More In Recent Settlements
- Settlement Of Wrongful Death Case
- GM Rollover Case Settled In Houston County
- SCOTUS Rejects Continental Carbon’s Appeal
- Roof Crush Settlement with Ford Motor Co.
Product Liability - Oct 6, 2008 10:16 - 0 Comments
U-haul trailers and more of the same
More In Product Liability
- ATV accidents bring heartbreak to families
- Jury awards $8.6 million in SUV rollover
- Federal government’s release of early warning data is a limited victory for consumers
- Comparison of the tests run by NHTSA and safety group
- New rollover study shows federal government’s roof strength standard will not protect vehicle occupants
Court Watch, Recalls Update - Sep 29, 2008 10:32 - 0 Comments
Atico International USA recalls personal blenders
More In Recalls Update
- Fisher-Price recalls learning pots and pans toys due to choking hazard
- Halogen work lights recalled
- Gas grills sold at Lowe’s stores recalled
- Dewalt recalls cordless brad nailers
- Baby Appleseed recalls cribs due to fall hazard
Leave a Reply