Enviromental Concerns - Written by Beasley Allen on Friday, October 27, 2006 12:00 - 0 Comments
Cancer Risk for Alabamians
Pat Byington, the former Vice-Chairman of the Alabama Environmental Management Commission, recently wrote about an important topic in state newspapers that you may not have seen. Mr. Byington, who served as Chairman of the Commission’s Strategic Planning Committee, contends that because of an Alabama policy decision, a person is more likely to get cancer in our state than in many of our neighboring states. In 1991, the Alabama Environmental Management Commission adopted a cancer-risk level to use in regulating the water quality of rivers and streams in Alabama. The Commission was asked to make a decision that all Alabamians should find important: “How many people does the state find acceptable to get cancer as a result of the toxic pollution that industries discharge in water under permits issued by the Alabama Department of Environmental Management?”
Mr. Byington contends that, despite being given the opportunity by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to adopt a more stringent risk level, the Commission, with the support of the Alabama Department of Public Health, adopted a cancer-risk level that was the least stringent. At present, while Alabama still has the same 1 in 100,000 cancer-risk level it adopted fifteen years ago, Mississippi, Florida and Georgia have all adopted the 1 in 1,000,000 cancer-risk level.
In order to get better information, Mr. Byington met with a UAB professor emeritus in epidemiology. This professor taught risk assessment for twenty years and served on the Agency for Toxic Substance and Disease Registries Board of Scientific Counselors, a federal agency that studies the health effects of pollution. The two discussed cancer and pollution, and Mr. Byington was reminded that – along with Alabama’s cancer-risk level – many of our environmental and health standards do not address sufficiently chronic diseases such as birth defects, asthma, and diabetes. The standards also do not adequately take into account the cumulative health impacts of toxic pollution.
Last July, the Environmental Management Commission’s Strategic Planning Committee unanimously recommended a new draft Environmental Management Strategic Plan for the state. One of the cornerstone goals within the plan is to “ensure regulatory standards are most protective of health and environment in the nation based on science and ecological conditions.” This goal was developed by two committee members, Dr. Kathleen Felker and Ken Hairston. Dr. Felker, a radiologist, is a passionate advocate for breast cancer awareness. Mr. Ken Hairston, General Counsel for Alabama A&M University, has been a champion within the Commission on behalf of environmental justice.
By the time you read this, the Environmental Management Commission will have had an opportunity to move forward with the strategic plan and the “most protective” goal to set into motion a re-evaluation of Alabama’s health-based environmental policies, standards, and regulations. If adopted, the result will be fewer cancers, cleaner air, land and water, and, most importantly, overall healthier Alabamians.
You may have read earlier where some business groups, such as the Business Council of Alabama, have opposed certain parts of this strategic plan. I don’t know about you, but it is hard for me to understand how any group would put their personal business interest above the health of Alabama citizens. If you know someone who has cancer, which I am sure you do, then you will understand why this strategic plan is so important. By the way, Pat Byington, who did great work while on the Commission, wasn’t reappointed when his term expired. In my opinion, that was Alabama’s loss and industry’s gain. We need folks like Pat Byington in state government and especially on boards and commissions that deal with environmental issues and concerns.
- Other races of interest for the general election
- The other congressional races
- Candidate for the Alabama Supreme Court calls for appointed judiciary
- Citigroup may have to pay billions in buybacks
- The outlook for passage of a strong DUI bill appears to be better
- Lilly Zyprexa group buyers win class action status
- Contessa premium foods wins Trade Secrets Case
- Judge awards $1.2 billion judgment to Johnson & Johnson
- Citigroup sues Wachovia and Wells fargo for $60 billion
- False claims Act Case pending against McKesson and Golden Horizons
- Florida sues MercK to recover money spent on Vioxx
- Johnson & Johnson paid $68 million to settle birth control cases
- Class action lawsuit says Biovail misled investors
- Missouri Court upholds $8.5 million Polio Vaccine Award
- Georgia Supreme Court rules that couple can sue vaccine company
- Experts conclude Pfizer manipulated studies
- New study shows drug samples may adversley affect children
- Excellent post.Preserve the smashing work,You should definitely have to keep upd...
- First-Class post.Maintain the eminent work,You should definitely have to keep up...
- As many people know, those who undergo MRI procedures often take gadolinium, a r...
- As many people know, those who undergo MRI procedures often take gadolinium, a r...
- Thanks for the notice! It's now corrected....
- It's Hand Arendall LLC, there's no comma between Hand and Arendall...
- I understand that the first $9000 is being currently released and depending on t...
- When you say they are doing this as quickly as possible, what do you mean.? As...
- Beasley Allen Law Firm
- Yamaha Rhino Lawyer
- Mesothelioma Support Blog
- Southern Injury Lawyer
- Nursing Home Abuse
- Mesothelioma Lawyer
- FLSA
- Jere Beasley Report
- Morgan Keegan Investment Fraud
- Unum Provident Denied Disability
- Pain Pumps
- Medtronic Heart Lead Recall
- Vytorin Cancer
- Digitek Recall
- HRT and Breast Cancer
- Ortho Evra and Blood Clots
- Heparin Recall
- Gadolinium and NSF
- Avandia and Heart Attacks
- Fosamax and ONJ
- Trasylol Recall
- Kugel Hernia Patch Recall
- Steven Johnson Syndrome (SJS)
- Chantix Recall
Recent Settlements - Aug 7, 2008 14:15 - 0 Comments
North Carolina Settles Jail Fire Death Claims
More In Recent Settlements
- Settlement Of Wrongful Death Case
- GM Rollover Case Settled In Houston County
- SCOTUS Rejects Continental Carbon’s Appeal
- Roof Crush Settlement with Ford Motor Co.
Product Liability - Nov 10, 2008 10:08 - 0 Comments
Yamaha Rhino demonstrated for CPSC
More In Product Liability
- FEMA not immune from toxic trailer suits
- The overlooked hazard relating to cargo injuries
- Single vehicle accidents remain a problem
- New federal rule attempts to preemt state tort claims related to seat belt injuries
- U-haul trailers and more of the same
Recalls Update - Oct 16, 2008 8:28 - 0 Comments
190,000 Soccer goals recalled
More In Recalls Update
- Rapid Reel recalls portable garden hose carts
- Sony recalls 440,000 Vaio laptops
- Worldwise, Inc. recalls retractable dog leashes
- Warning relating to Bassinets after 2 babies are strangled
- Coffee makers recalled by Sears due to fire and burn hazards
Leave a Reply