Mass Torts - Written by Beasley Allen on Thursday, August 3, 2006 9:39 - 0 Comments
The Risks Of Taking Fosamax Appear To Be Great
Last month we wrote about the mounting problems associated with the popular osteoporosis drug Fosamax. Since that time it has become most apparent that the problems are widespread. As a result, the Fosamax litigation scene will be very active. Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ), a disfiguring condition that leads to the breakdown of the jawbone and loss of teeth, is clearly a most serious matter. Fosamax has been taken by a tremendous number of women for stronger bones. Unfortunately, they were never warned by Merck & Co. of the risks associated with Fosamax. It is now abundantly clear that Merck knew about the risks. The FDA had actually asked the drug company to warn about ONJ. Obviously, Merck had a duty to inform doctors and patients. For years, doctors and dentists have known about the increased risk of ONJ caused by chemotherapy. But, the medical community had little, if any, knowledge connecting Fosamax use and ONJ.
In January 2005, the FDA recommended that Merck change Fosamax’s label to include ONJ warnings. As a result, the company revised its packaging information in July of last year. As we stated last month, this drug is one of Merck’s best sellers, with $3.2 billion in sales and 22.4 million prescriptions written in 2005. The company says on its website that most reported cases of bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis have been in cancer patients treated with the drugs intravenously. The statement says:
ONJ is not well understood and may occur for a number of reasons. . . . In controlled clinical trials involving more than 17,000 patients, contributing as much as 10 years’ data with alendronate [the technical name for Fosamax] there have been no reports of ONJ.
At its 2006 annual meeting, the American Association of Endodontists said that until further information becomes available, all patients taking bisphosphonates should be considered at some risk for ONJ. Patients were told to inform their dental care providers and other specialists that they are on the medications. It has been reported that some dentists actually turn away patients who tell them that they are on bisphosphonates. Others ask those patients to quit the medication until their dental treatment is finished.
Perhaps it would be helpful to set out exactly what osteoporosis is all about and how Fosamax comes into the picture. First, let’s take a look at osteoporosis.
• Osteoporosis is thinning and weakening of the bones.
• It affects mostly women after menopause.
• In both men and women, osteoporosis may also be caused by certain medicines called corticosteroids, used to treat some leukemias and also to suppress rejection after bone marrow and organ transplants.
• Osteoporosis can cause fractures, which may happen during everyday activities, such as lifting, or from a minor injury that would normally not cause bones to break.
Fosamax, which is being taken by a tremendous number of women, is made by Merck & Co. As advertised and promoted by Merck, Fosamax is said to be for:
• The treatment or prevention of osteoporosis in women after menopause.
• Treatment to increase bone mass in men with osteoporosis.
• The treatment of osteoporosis in people taking corticosteroids.
Our firm continues to investigate potential claims for women who have taken Fosamax and who have suffered severe injuries and disability as a result. Any person who is now taking Fosamax should contact their personal doctor and discuss whether they should remain on the drug. If you need additional information on the ongoing litigation over the drug, you can either go to our website, BeasleyAllen.com, or contact either Jerry Taylor or Chad Cook directly at our office (800-898-2034).
- Other races of interest for the general election
- The other congressional races
- Candidate for the Alabama Supreme Court calls for appointed judiciary
- Citigroup may have to pay billions in buybacks
- The outlook for passage of a strong DUI bill appears to be better
- Lilly Zyprexa group buyers win class action status
- Contessa premium foods wins Trade Secrets Case
- Judge awards $1.2 billion judgment to Johnson & Johnson
- Citigroup sues Wachovia and Wells fargo for $60 billion
- False claims Act Case pending against McKesson and Golden Horizons
- Florida sues MercK to recover money spent on Vioxx
- Johnson & Johnson paid $68 million to settle birth control cases
- Class action lawsuit says Biovail misled investors
- Missouri Court upholds $8.5 million Polio Vaccine Award
- Georgia Supreme Court rules that couple can sue vaccine company
- Experts conclude Pfizer manipulated studies
- New study shows drug samples may adversley affect children
- Excellent post.Preserve the smashing work,You should definitely have to keep upd...
- First-Class post.Maintain the eminent work,You should definitely have to keep up...
- As many people know, those who undergo MRI procedures often take gadolinium, a r...
- As many people know, those who undergo MRI procedures often take gadolinium, a r...
- Thanks for the notice! It's now corrected....
- It's Hand Arendall LLC, there's no comma between Hand and Arendall...
- I understand that the first $9000 is being currently released and depending on t...
- When you say they are doing this as quickly as possible, what do you mean.? As...
- Beasley Allen Law Firm
- Mesothelioma Support Blog
- Nursing Home Abuse
- Southern Injury Lawyer
- Yamaha Rhino Lawyer
- Mesothelioma Lawyer
- Jere Beasley Report
- Unum Provident Denied Disability
- Morgan Keegan Investment Fraud
- FLSA
- HRT and Breast Cancer
- Chantix Recall
- Trasylol Recall
- Steven Johnson Syndrome (SJS)
- Fosamax and ONJ
- Ortho Evra and Blood Clots
- Avandia and Heart Attacks
- Kugel Hernia Patch Recall
- Digitek Recall
- Heparin Recall
- Gadolinium and NSF
- Vytorin Cancer
- Pain Pumps
- Medtronic Heart Lead Recall
Recent Settlements - Aug 7, 2008 14:15 - 0 Comments
North Carolina Settles Jail Fire Death Claims
More In Recent Settlements
- Settlement Of Wrongful Death Case
- GM Rollover Case Settled In Houston County
- SCOTUS Rejects Continental Carbon’s Appeal
- Roof Crush Settlement with Ford Motor Co.
Product Liability - Nov 10, 2008 10:08 - 0 Comments
Yamaha Rhino demonstrated for CPSC
More In Product Liability
- FEMA not immune from toxic trailer suits
- The overlooked hazard relating to cargo injuries
- Single vehicle accidents remain a problem
- New federal rule attempts to preemt state tort claims related to seat belt injuries
- U-haul trailers and more of the same
Recalls Update - Oct 16, 2008 8:28 - 0 Comments
190,000 Soccer goals recalled
More In Recalls Update
- Rapid Reel recalls portable garden hose carts
- Sony recalls 440,000 Vaio laptops
- Worldwise, Inc. recalls retractable dog leashes
- Warning relating to Bassinets after 2 babies are strangled
- Coffee makers recalled by Sears due to fire and burn hazards
Leave a Reply