Capitol Observations - Written by Beasley Allen on Thursday, March 9, 2006 11:13 - 0 Comments
Case Settled Against Ford Motor Company and Firestone
Our firm just settled a lawsuit that had been filed against Ford Motor Company and Firestone Tire Company. One of our clients, John Means, was driving his 1997 Ford Explorer on I-65 going north from Greenville to Montgomery. The Explorer suffered a tread separation on the driver’s side rear tire. When the Firestone tire detreaded, Mr. Means lost control of the Explorer and it rolled over five times. Mr. Means, April Powell, the front seat passenger, and Natasha Womack, one of the rear seat passengers, were severely injured and incurred substantial medical costs. Antoine Thagard, another rear seat passenger, was injured and eventually died from her injuries about one month after the accident. Mr. Means was airlifted to University Hospital, where he remained in intensive care for about a month with a traumatic brain injury. Ms. Womack suffered permanent memory loss and had to undergo extensive plastic surgery, including skin grafts, to repair the compound fractures she suffered to both legs. Ms. Powell underwent reconstructive surgery on her arm. All the plaintiffs are extremely grateful for the excellent medical care they received at Baptist Medical Center South in Montgomery and at University Hospital in Birmingham. Ms. Thagard’s injuries were irreversible and her death couldn’t have been prevented.
The evidence was clear that Mr. Means was traveling well within the posted speed limit and was operating the vehicle properly in every respect. Through discovery we learned that the 1997 Ford Explorer (UPN 105 code name) is susceptible to oversteer when there is a rear tire detread situation. The Explorer is basically uncontrollable when there is a detread for two reasons:
• First, when the tire detreads it has a tendency to pull the vehicle in the direction of the detread. The driver has to counter-steer, and when the tread comes off, the Explorer will suddenly go into an oversteer situation.
• The rear of the vehicle has a tendency to skate when a tire is detreading. Actually, Ford’s own testing displayed the skate phenomena. Skate occurs when the rear end bounces up and down at a certain frequency. Ford internal testing found that when the skate phenomena appears, the vehicle will slide in one direction or the other without the necessity of moving the steering wheel.
Firestone commissioned its own study of the Explorer which confirmed the oversteer problem before the U.S. recall campaign. John Lampe, the CEO of Firestone, ordered that Firestone employees park their company-owned Explorers, which was most significant. The Firestone FR 480 tire, although not one of the tires recalled by Firestone, was the same size, had many of the same design features, and was manufactured in the same plant where the recalled tires were manufactured. In addition, the tire had undergone an extensive cost reduction program that resulted in design changes that made it much more susceptible to detread events. From its outward appearance, the tire looked to be in good shape at the time of the detread. The tire had plenty of tread, was properly inflated and was being properly used at the time.
This case points out graphically how defective products can cause serious injury or death to people without any warning. Defects such as the tire detread and the Explorer’s handling capability defect are not discoverable or observable by the average person. The tragedy is that an accident like this can happen to anybody because of the defects. That’s the reason the public has to rely on the manufacturers to design and test their products to provide safety when the product is being used reasonably by folks like our clients in this case.
Greg Allen, Graham Esdale, and Ben Baker from our firm handled this most important case. Ted Bozeman, Russ Bozeman, John Gibbs, and Stuart Vance assisted with trial preparation, and Richard Hartley would have been active at trial had the case not settled. We were glad that we could work out a satisfactory settlement with both defendants. At the defendants’ request the amount of the settlement is confidential.
- Other races of interest for the general election
- The other congressional races
- Candidate for the Alabama Supreme Court calls for appointed judiciary
- Citigroup may have to pay billions in buybacks
- The outlook for passage of a strong DUI bill appears to be better
- Lilly Zyprexa group buyers win class action status
- Contessa premium foods wins Trade Secrets Case
- Judge awards $1.2 billion judgment to Johnson & Johnson
- Citigroup sues Wachovia and Wells fargo for $60 billion
- False claims Act Case pending against McKesson and Golden Horizons
- Florida sues MercK to recover money spent on Vioxx
- Johnson & Johnson paid $68 million to settle birth control cases
- Class action lawsuit says Biovail misled investors
- Missouri Court upholds $8.5 million Polio Vaccine Award
- Georgia Supreme Court rules that couple can sue vaccine company
- Experts conclude Pfizer manipulated studies
- New study shows drug samples may adversley affect children
- Excellent post.Preserve the smashing work,You should definitely have to keep upd...
- First-Class post.Maintain the eminent work,You should definitely have to keep up...
- As many people know, those who undergo MRI procedures often take gadolinium, a r...
- As many people know, those who undergo MRI procedures often take gadolinium, a r...
- Thanks for the notice! It's now corrected....
- It's Hand Arendall LLC, there's no comma between Hand and Arendall...
- I understand that the first $9000 is being currently released and depending on t...
- When you say they are doing this as quickly as possible, what do you mean.? As...
- Beasley Allen Law Firm
- Mesothelioma Support Blog
- Southern Injury Lawyer
- Yamaha Rhino Lawyer
- Mesothelioma Lawyer
- Nursing Home Abuse
- Unum Provident Denied Disability
- FLSA
- Morgan Keegan Investment Fraud
- Jere Beasley Report
- Trasylol Recall
- Medtronic Heart Lead Recall
- Avandia and Heart Attacks
- Fosamax and ONJ
- Steven Johnson Syndrome (SJS)
- HRT and Breast Cancer
- Vytorin Cancer
- Pain Pumps
- Ortho Evra and Blood Clots
- Chantix Recall
- Gadolinium and NSF
- Digitek Recall
- Kugel Hernia Patch Recall
- Heparin Recall
Recent Settlements - Aug 7, 2008 14:15 - 0 Comments
North Carolina Settles Jail Fire Death Claims
More In Recent Settlements
- Settlement Of Wrongful Death Case
- GM Rollover Case Settled In Houston County
- SCOTUS Rejects Continental Carbon’s Appeal
- Roof Crush Settlement with Ford Motor Co.
Product Liability - Nov 10, 2008 10:08 - 0 Comments
Yamaha Rhino demonstrated for CPSC
More In Product Liability
- FEMA not immune from toxic trailer suits
- The overlooked hazard relating to cargo injuries
- Single vehicle accidents remain a problem
- New federal rule attempts to preemt state tort claims related to seat belt injuries
- U-haul trailers and more of the same
Recalls Update - Oct 16, 2008 8:28 - 0 Comments
190,000 Soccer goals recalled
More In Recalls Update
- Rapid Reel recalls portable garden hose carts
- Sony recalls 440,000 Vaio laptops
- Worldwise, Inc. recalls retractable dog leashes
- Warning relating to Bassinets after 2 babies are strangled
- Coffee makers recalled by Sears due to fire and burn hazards
Leave a Reply